Inducing Labor Past 39 Weeks Does Not Increase Your Chances of Having a C-Section – Expecting Science
Inducing labor: A way to avoid a cesarean? - Harvard Health
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk | PLOS ONE
induction and caesareans | AIMS
Labor Induction and C-Sections - Women's Healthcare Associates
Evidence on: Inducing for Due Dates - Evidence Based Birth®
Dr. de la Peña, M.D. | Blog | Induce Labor or Wait for the Baby?
Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy - American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Induced labor at 39 weeks may reduce likelihood of C-section, new study suggests | Milken Institute School of Public Health | The George Washington University
Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study | Journal of Perinatology
The ARRIVE Study: Does induction of labor for women at 39 weeks gestation lower the cesarean section rate?
Healthcare | Free Full-Text | Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Not So Fast: "Induction Reduces Cesarean" Study Overlooks Major Issues
VBAC: Labour Induction
Research debates - New Zealand College of Midwives - New Zealand College of Midwives
Labor induction doesn't decrease risk of C-section for full-term pregnancies, study finds
Induction increases the chance of caesarean - Dr Sara Wickham
Is Performing a C-Section Better Than Inducing Labour
Choosing to induce labor at 39 weeks reduces risk of C-sections, study finds
Type 1 Diabetes, Induction for Preeclampsia & Unplanned Cesarean - The Birth Hour
Elective caesarean section | healthdirect
